Twitch CEO explains: Why some are banned and others are not – The controversial topic

Twitch CEO explains: Why some are banned and others are not – The controversial topic

Currently, TwitchCon 2019 is taking place in San Diego, California. Twitch CEO Emmett Shear spoke there about the major controversial topic of recent weeks: Why some Twitch streamers get banned while others do not. However, this explanation also faces some criticism.

What is the problem? In recent weeks, there has been ongoing discussion on social media about how Twitch applies its rules to decide whether streamers are banned or not.

For example, streamers were temporarily banned for the following:

Twitch-Quqco
The outfit was probably deemed too provocative by Twitch.
More on the topic
Streamer throws cat and kicks dog on Twitch, thousands demand ban
von Jürgen Horn

On the other hand, some streamers were not banned:

Recommended editorial content

At this point you will find external content from Twitter that complements the article.

I consent to external content being displayed to me. Personal data can be transmitted to third party platforms. Read more about our privacy policy.
Link to the Twitter content
This was a huge issue in July

Fans of the streamers feel that it seems arbitrary when Twitch bans someone and when it does not.

This seems, in the eyes of the players, to depend on factors that are not transparent.

“We consider the context and whether there is intent”

This is what the boss says: Shear begins his response by admitting: Twitch has made mistakes. Every team makes mistakes when making thousands of decisions a day. However, those are corrected, and there are appeal processes.

Yet, even when accounting for errors, there will be situations that may appear similar on the surface but carry different penalties:

  • Twitch pays very close attention to the context and intent behind actions
  • If intent is recognized and a violation of the guidelines is identified, then the rest flows “like on rails”
  • Furthermore, people who have been warned before are punished more severely than others
Recommended editorial content

At this point you will find external content from Twitch that complements the article.

I consent to external content being displayed to me. Personal data can be transmitted to third party platforms. Read more about our privacy policy.
Link to the Twitch content

Fans believe: context doesn’t matter on Twitch

This is being discussed: The clip is viewed critically (via reddit). One user states: “What he says is 100% correct. They just do not apply it.”

Twitch is accused of not considering the context of an action when imposing a penalty. They have their “favorites” and do not follow a clear line in their decisions.

Twitch-CEO-Emmet-Shear
The Twitch CEO in March 2019.

On reddit/livestreamfails, there is a belief that women receive preferential treatment. While Twitch strictly addressed LoL streamer TF Blade and banned him – a female streamer with similar behavior might get through.

The mood on reddit is polarized. Apparently, people wish for harsher penalties against women who seek clicks with sexuality, and lighter penalties for anything that falls into the broader culture of “gaming” or “animes”.

From the players’ perspective, Twitch often punishes minor incidents that occur accidentally during a live stream when something happens on the street to a streamer.

More on the topic
The Twitch director would like to ban the cat thrower, but so far nothing has happened
von Jürgen Horn
Source(s): gamesradar
Deine Meinung? Diskutiere mit uns!
7
I like it!
This is an AI-powered translation. Some inaccuracies might exist.
Lost Password

Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.