Man behind Dragon Age explains why Baldur’s Gate 3 won’t be as important for gaming as everyone hopes

Man behind Dragon Age explains why Baldur’s Gate 3 won’t be as important for gaming as everyone hopes

The developer Mark Darrah is the man behind Dragon Age: The Veilguard and previously launched the SF-MMO Anthem for BioWare. In his podcast, he discusses the influence of the Steam hit Baldur’s Gate 3 on future games. The influence of Baldur’s Gate 3 will be smaller than players are now hoping. This is because Baldur’s Gate 3 forgoes a protagonist with their own voice to grant players more freedom – but future games may not be able to do that so easily.

This is what Darrah says: Darrah mentions that the influence of a game on future games and its sales figures are not necessarily in a linear relationship. He believes that, despite Baldur’s Gate 3 being incredibly successful, it will not have as large an influence on future role-playing games as laypeople might imagine.

But that is not because Baldur’s Gate 3 is so expensive that no one can replicate it (like GTA V), but because of its special status:

Baldur’s Gate 3 has changed the landscape concerning who is willing to look at a role-playing game. It has significantly expanded the space of the genre, which is great. But I believe that the impacts on the way games are developed are smaller than people outside the video game industry might expect.

Anyone hoping that Baldur’s Gate 3 marks the beginning of a golden age for role-playing games may be disappointed.

Baldur’s Gate 3 succeeded where no other game could

What is the reason for this? Darrah explains: Baldur’s Gate 3 had optimal preconditions that other studios and games cannot recreate.

Baldur’s Gate 3 succeeded with things that other studios would never be able to pull off, according to Darrah.

What does he mean? Darrah explains that Baldur’s Gate 3 utilized a protagonist without their own voice and simple cinematics. Other games would not be allowed to do something like that.

As a result, Baldur’s Gate 3 could offer players many more choices and freedoms.

Dungeons & Dragons at the height of its popularity fueled Baldur’s Gate 3

What advantages did Baldur’s Gate 3 have: Darrah explains that Baldur’s Gate 3 is an anomaly because so many strong elements come into play:

  • It utilized the brand “Dungeons and Dragons” at the peak of its popularity – since then, popularity has declined again
  • The game replicates Dungeons and Dragons as a role-playing game and therefore has much more freedom

Baldur’s Gate 3 will have some influence on future role-playing games, but not as large an influence as its immense success suggests.

Recommended editorial content

At this point you will find external content from YouTube that complements the article.

I consent to external content being displayed to me. Personal data can be transmitted to third party platforms. Read more about our privacy policy.
Link to the YouTube content

This is what it’s about: Darrah basically says: Baldur’s Gate 3 could only give the player this much agency because it replicates Dungeons & Dragons, and the core of the game is that players can do anything they want.

If a game lacks this setting, players have different expectations of a game and then expect a clearer story.

Darrah himself faced harsh criticism for his last game Dragon Age: The Veilguard and was annoyed by the derision that poured over him: Man behind Dragon Age says buyers have no right to cruelty – Twitch streamer says: yes

Deine Meinung? Diskutiere mit uns!
4
I like it!
This is an AI-powered translation. Some inaccuracies might exist.
Lost Password

Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.